Contagrip vs Vibram | Which Is Better?

Tyler Aug 10, 2024
175 People Read
Side by side comparsion of the contagrip outsole on the Salomon Quest 4 and the Vibram outsole on the Merrell Moab 3

In this article, I will be reviewing the Contagrip vs Vibram sole. We will be reviewing and comparing the pros and cons of both rubber soles in terms of traction, shock absorption, and durability, and I will be giving my honest take on which sole is better.

I’ve spent hundreds of hours testing each outsole on different hiking boots. I’ve previously tested the Contagrip on the Salomon X 4 Ultra and Salomon Quest 4, as well as the Vibram on the Merrell Moab 3, Hoka Kaha 2, and Hoka Anacapa 2. At the end, as a experienced mountain guide, I’ll give my professional and honest opinion.

Contagrip vs Vibram has been a popular debate among many hikers. Contagrip is manufactured by Salomon. Vibram, an Italian company with a rich history in developing specialized outsoles, outsources its outsoles to numerous popular brands, including Merrell, Hoka, and many others. In contrast, we will only focus on hiking boots.


Contagrip vs Vibram Soles

 

Contagrip is featured in all Salomon boots. Salomon specifically designed the enhanced lug pattern for hiking boot usage. Both Contagrip and Vibram soles are used in trail running shoes, offering benefits like improved performance on challenging terrains.

The tread pattern is very distinct, they offer different patterns based on the type of boot whether trail shoes or different boots. The Vibram sole has many different subcategories depending on your activity or job. Both models utilize specialized rubber, and the lug patterns vary among them. Vibram has the upper hand in terms of variety, with over 10 different models for different activities, as I stated before.

 


view of the lug pattern on the contagrip outsole

Shock Absorption

 

Both outsoles are known to be excellent at shock absorption. While testing the Salomon Quest 4, I stated that these are some of the best boots for shock absorption because they have the Contagrip soles.  Compared to the Merrell Moab 3, which uses the Vibram outsole, they do have the same level of shock absorption. Both pass the "jump test" that I use when testing each boot.

I personally can attest that I did not incur any injuries due to poor shock absorption for both of these soles. I tested both outsoles on various terrains using different hiking boots, and I can say that the shock absorption is comparable when comparing Contragrip and Vibram soles.

Contagrip Shock absorption: 5 out of 5

Vibram shock absorption: 5 out of 5

Winner: Tie

 


Traction On Wet Surfaces

 

Starting off, I must say the Vibram soles are slightly more flexible than the Contagrip. What does that mean?

Unfortunately, when placed under high pressure in an uneven service, the Vibram soles conform to the surface, reducing traction. Compared to the Contagrip, its stiffer design prevents it from conforming to the uneven surface, thereby enhancing its traction. However, this is a catch-22. The increased comfort of Vibrams outsole contributes to their greater flexibility.

I tested both of these outsoles in various wet and dry conditions. I must say that the Contagrip outsole performs better on dry, rough, and uneven terrain. The Vibram outsole has more grip in wet conditions, such as wet mud or stone. When it comes to wet rock surfaces, the Vibram outsole provides better traction, reducing the risk of slips and accidents.

The Vibram lugs vary depending on the model you’re using; however, it is undeniable that the Vibram outsole performs better on wet surfaces.

Contagrip Traction: 4 out of 5

Vibram shock absorption: 5 out of 5

Winner: Vibram

 


View of lug pattern on vibram megagrip outsole

Durability

 

Both Contagrip and Vibram have provided me with excellent durability. I've used many variations of the Vibram sole on hiking boots, such as the Hoka Kaha and Anacapa, as well as the Vibram Megagrip on the Merrell Moab 3.

None of the lugs or traction show signs of wear and tear. The same goes for Contagrip by Salomon; the lug and traction patterns have shown no signs of slowing down. My testing and research have demonstrated the excellent durability of both of these outsoles.

Contagrip Shock absorption: 5 out of 5

Vibram shock absorption: 5 out of 5

Winner: Tie


Contagrip vs Vibram trail running shoes: Which one is better?

I must begin by stating that both of these outsoles, crafted from high-quality materials, significantly enhance your hiking experience. Both are durable and have excellent shock absorption; hence, both have the same score of 5 out of 5 for these categories. I will say the Vibram outsole has slightly better traction than the Contagrip. However, the Contagrip comes in a close second.

Contagrip has an advantage over Vibram because they manufacture Contagrip themselves. They are in control of their manufacturing and can serve the customer better with enhanced technology and upgrades based on previous defects. Anyone looking to improve their trail performance should try both of these outsoles.

Both Vibram and Contagrip have gotten me through a variety of long treks and treacherous terrain. I can gladly say I've put in the time and effort into testing both of these outsoles, and they are both high quality.

Frequently Asked Questions



Is Contagrip durable?

Yes! very much so. As I stated before previously, I have tested many hiking boots with Contagrip and the outsoles have shown no signs of losing durability. They grip and hold traction true to this day, over years and years of use. 

Is Vibram really better?

Like we said, both outsoles are great and made with quality materials. In my expert opinion, Vibram has slightly better traction and grip. Contagrip is a very close second. 

Who makes Contagrip?

Contagrip is designed and manufactured by Salomon themselves. 

Adventure Awaits,

Tyler